Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Future leaders of Manitoba


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:12, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

Future leaders of Manitoba

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Seems like a nonnotable recently-established local award, despite the local news sources. NawlinWiki (talk) 18:48, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

Interesting and looks like and very solid sources.

(talk) 13:58, 24 May 2010 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.79.144.27 (talk) — 24.79.144.27 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.


 * Keep The sources seem solid enough and it seems like a fairly notable group, although mainly of interest to Manitoba itself. Kitfoxxe (talk) 19:25, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:31, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

Keep... I'm new to wikipedia, but this article is backed up in the Winnipeg Free Press and Winnipeg Sun (two large Canadian newspapers). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.161.71.218 (talk) 16:54, 26 May 2010 (UTC) — 142.161.71.218 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

Keep. I was there... hugh event -- the mayor of Winnipeg was a presenter. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.200.6.214 (talk) 22:41, 27 May 2010 (UTC) — 205.200.6.214 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:08, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Such an award is notable or not depending on whether it has received significant, independent coverage. This award has not. It received brief mentions in two respectable newspapers - basically, two-paragraph items stating that the event took place. Not enough to amount to "significant" coverage. Maybe the award will become more noteworthy in the future, but for now it doesn't qualify. (BTW, about the three single-purpose ISP accounts who showed up here to comment on the article - their only other interest on Wikipedia is Adam Smoluk, one of the winners of the award. Just FYI.) --MelanieN (talk) 19:09, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
 * Delete - coverage is not extensive enough to establish notability. Thparkth (talk) 03:19, 31 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete. Four sources with slight coverage don't add up to significant coverage. One reputable source providing significant coverage would be sufficient. See ORG. --Pnm (talk) 06:02, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.