Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Future of air transport in the United Kingdom


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Keep per WP:SNOW. Nomination is highly inappropriate and reeks of WP:POINTy issues going on, as does editor's other nomination above. Non-admin close. Redfarmer (talk) 21:18, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

Future of air transport in the United Kingdom

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

among a multitude of other issues, how does this not violate WP:Crystal Kumqat1406 (talk) 19:01, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep - It is no where near WP:CRYSTAL, as the article is fully sourced. Bad faith nomination in my opinion. D.M.N. (talk) 19:12, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep - like D.M.N says. Colonel Warden (talk) 19:52, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep- not crystalballing, this is about the British Government's strategic framework for air transport. Greswik (talk) 20:14, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: You may wish to see this ANI conversation regarding the nominator and AFD discussions. D.M.N. (talk) 20:18, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep- properly sourced non-speculative article about UK government policy. The nomination for deletion was highly inappropriate. Mathsci (talk) 20:39, 26 January 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.