Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Futurestep


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete both per a lack of reliable sources and apparent failure to establish independent notability. -- jonny - m t  06:04, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

Futurestep

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

non-notable sub-genre. appears to be entirely original research. neon white talk 20:57, 17 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Nominating the following related article for the same reason as above : -


 * Keep The topic is notable enough for inclusion. Besides AfD's are not supposed to be dispute resolution mechanism's. Nominator proposed a merger, which failed to gain a consensus at Talk:Drum and bass.  --Firefly322 (talk) 01:16, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jauerbackdude?/dude. 14:49, 22 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete. Both articles have been unreferenced for several months, so I think it is valid to question whether they satisfy WP:GNG. Bondegezou (talk) 16:42, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Reliable sources not presented.-Wafulz (talk) 17:00, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.   -- the wub  "?!"  18:25, 22 July 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.