Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FuturixImager (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 12:56, 29 August 2009 (UTC)

FuturixImager
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Completing AFD for GreyCat, who relisted 2007 AFD (which resulted in delete). Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 12:28, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

Thanks, Ten Pound Hammer. Rationale: article about non-notable software without any solid references. The only third-party reference that this article lists - - is a review thread at forum with user comments. Google reports only 620 hits, most of which are numerous software directories. No published reviews or any other publications, nothing on Google Books, etc. --GreyCat (talk) 13:00, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this software. Joe Chill (talk) 14:07, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I want to point out that in parallel discussion in Russian Wikipedia there was some authoritative coverage found. Futurix (talk) 18:59, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  —GreyCat (talk) 18:19, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per Joe. --Cyber cobra (talk) 22:44, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.