Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fuzzy similarity based TOPSIS


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 04:27, 3 February 2023 (UTC)

Fuzzy similarity based TOPSIS

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

I’ve checked this article carefully for a long time and found several issues. I’ve requested to delete this article because of the following reasons:

(1)	There is an article for TOPSIS method already. Why do we need another article for a small extension on the TOPSIS method? For example, there is a page for Analytic hierarchy process. Should we have a page for “Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process”?

(2)	This is a clear case of self-promotion on Wikipedia (user name = author's name of the primary reference). Also, Similarity-based-TOPSIS has been deleted recently because of self-promotion issue: Articles for deletion/Similarity-based-TOPSIS

(3)	There are not enough independent references, and it cannot pass the notability factor of Wikipedia.

(4)	This article is hard to read and has no value for the readers. The structure of the article is like an academic paper. Also, there are so many extensions to the TOPSIS method which are more valuable than this small extension.

Also, there are more reasons, but I think the above reasons are enough to delete this article from Wikipedia. Scholartop (talk) 04:27, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Mathematics and Computing.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:10, 27 January 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete or Merge to TOPSIS as per the prior AfD. PianoDan (talk) 22:22, 2 February 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.