Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fynn Kliemann


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:10, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

Fynn Kliemann

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

YouTuber, lacks credible sourcing, fails WP:GNG. Promotional. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 15:01, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Businesspeople. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 15:01, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:33, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete, yet another non-notable YouTuber. Ari T. Benchaim (talk) 00:39, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete a non-notable performer on YouTube.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:30, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep sources are sufficient. Several are indepth. He meets notability. I am not sure why all above, cant consider these sources sufficient!Craigwikiman (talk) 18:25, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Blocked for UPE. MER-C 06:12, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep - The sources used in the article are reliable, and they show notability. Therefore, it meets WP:GNG and passes WP:BASIC. -AuthorAuthor (talk) 22:11, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - the author is a blocked sockpuppet of a serial copyright infringer. Presumptive deletion applies. Note the comments at Contributor copyright investigations/Outdoor-Bro - BLP violations are also in play. MER-C 06:18, 11 June 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.