Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Góra, Kętrzyn County


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. The redirect target does not appear to exist. While there's no one advocating deletion aside from the nom, there isn't really anyone arguing for keep given what Piotrus' longer comment was. I don't see re-spinning it as helping when this redirect can be handled editorially when/if the target is created. Star  Mississippi  01:21, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

Góra, Kętrzyn County

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Mass-created article created by Kotbot, a bot operated by Kotniski.

The location given in the article is empty terrain without evidence of ever having been inhabited.

Briefly, there is no evidence that an inhabited settlement by the name Góra (literally just hill/mountain) ever existed at the site. Whilst German-era military maps show a place called Annahöhe near that location, this is obviously a different name and also not evidence of legal recognition of Annahöhe. The Polish GUS/BDL database, which includes census data, does not hold any data for a place called Góra in Kętrzyn County so this is not a place where the Polish government has collected census data in decades if ever. Whilst the TERYT database describes a "settlement" at this location, this classification was given to many different types of location include forestry offices, state farms, railway facilities etc. and is not evidence of an actual community by this name at this location.

It appears entirely possible that this place was abandoned at the end of WW2 and has never been inhabited under Polish rule, and so there never was any kind of legally-recognised settlement by this name at this location.

Happy to accept a redirect to Glitajny, which this is listed as being a locality within according to the PL wiki article. FOARP (talk) 11:21, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Poland. FOARP (talk) 11:21, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
 * "Annahöhe" was at the same location, but the name on the map is "Vro. Annahöhe" which means it was a folwark. Peter James (talk) 14:25, 15 October 2023 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  12:11, 22 October 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:12, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Weak keep or merge and redirect. Former, no claim of historical significance, very generic name. I don't feel like browsking through 10+ pages at TERYT to see if it is indexed there as a hamlet (osada) or whatever, but I am willing to AGF it is there per footnote given. I am fine with redirecting this to Glitajny, where we should add a sentence about former settlments in the region.
 * Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 09:17, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * To reiterate, I am OK with redirecting to Glitajny, which also appears acceptable to Piotrus. FOARP (talk) 11:24, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment The only Glitajny with an English Wikipedia article is Glitajny, Bartoszyce County which looks like a different place. Eluchil404 (talk) 22:27, 4 November 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.