Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gülnaz Sultan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 00:51, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

Gülnaz Sultan

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This page seems to be another article in the series of fictional Ottoman history which includes creating stories and information about the Ottoman royalty. It was created by a user who doesn't seem to be an expert in Ottoman history and probably contains original research as I couldn't find any information about this woman. There's no mention of her on the sources that I know including this website which lists the spouses and children of the Ottoman sultans. If a reliable source can't be found, the article should be deleted. Keivan.f Talk 21:24, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. This seems to be not only a(nother) fabricated article about a(nother) fictitious character, but the fact that it includes a false list of so-called references that don't even mention her (Alderson writes "none of the names of his wives seems to have been recorded" and doesn't record the names of her alledged sons eg) makes it some kind of vandalism, for which its creator should be blocked.--Phso2 (talk) 21:47, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. Agree, the references fail verification. Seraphimsystem (talk) 22:31, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. Definitely seems to be fake, no specific references and several basic facts fail verification. Chamboz (talk) 23:47, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:36, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:36, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:36, 10 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete - can't find evidence of notability. CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   18:01, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - as with all of these, if no sources can be found, it doesn't pass WP:V. If later sources are found, the page can possibly be recreated. Smmurphy(Talk) 19:16, 10 April 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.