Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/G-Aerosports


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 18:54, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

G-Aerosports

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Lack of quality sources to meet WP:GNG, fails WP:CORPDEPTH. searches revealed nothing better. —  Insertcleverphrasehere (or here)  06:13, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 08:28, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Greece-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 08:29, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

This is a legitimate manufacturer and has to be included in Wikipedia, like tons of other plane, car etc. manufacturers. Even extremely rare car models (some single prototypes) have been included. There is absloutely no reason for deletion Skartsis (talk) 19:38, 6 February 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, T. Canens (talk) 07:41, 8 February 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz Humbug! 07:03, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete -- A bunch of photos in Flying does not confer notability on the company, which is what the article is about. Rhadow (talk) 16:16, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. The scant coverage (I have not been able to find much in my BEFORE that was not in the article) seems to be on this really cool looking faux-fighter ultralight. I do not think the ultralight itself would be notable. This very small single-product company definitely does not pass GNG or CORPDEPTH.Icewhiz (talk) 08:14, 21 February 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.