Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/G-Log


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was No Consensus defaulting to Keep, disagreement over notability. Davewild (talk) 14:30, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

G-Log

 * – (View AfD)

No citations or references on notability. Company no longer exists since Nov 2005 - you'd imagine that anything notable would have been merged with Oracle article by now. Bardcom (talk) 17:33, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete/Redirect – As mentioned by the nominator – all relevant information has been incorporated into the Oracle piece. Shoessss | Chat  18:41, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep if the original company was notable before Oracle acquired it, it remains notable. Notability is permanent. The total information from this article that was actually incorporated into the Oracle Corporation article is: G-Log	September 2005	Transportation Management Solutions	N/A That wasn't a "merge," it was a "delete almost everything and merge." DGG (talk) 02:44, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. OK, I have restructured the page which was a mess. As DGG says the content wasn't merged. I also agree that a merged company retains its notability. My problem is that I am not particularly convinced that the company was notable. However, in marginal cases we should default to keep. BlueValour (talk) 00:15, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment Still no references to notability though. Google throws out the usual amount of press releases, but I can't find anything notable.  Have you had any luck?  Anybody? Bardcom (talk) 01:08, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment - there are significant endorsements here and here. Just about enough for a keep IMHO. BlueValour (talk) 01:23, 22 March 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.