Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/G-Unit the Movement


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  d elete. - Mailer Diablo 06:53, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

G-Unit the Movement

 * – (View AfD) (View log)
 * – (View AfD) (View log)

There is no such thing as a "G-Unit movement". There's the G-Unit group and record label but nothing to suggest a movement. The author uses G-Unit artists MySpaces as references and calls it a "movement", which is original research. Spellcast 07:33, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
 * strong delete per nom, on top of that, it's horribly written. Chris 07:41, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong delete 'nuff said. ORfancruftbiaspoorlywrittennonsense. ~ | twsx | talkcont | 09:30, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Firm delete - pure rubbish. -- Dan  12:48, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Especially because of all the MySpace links. Escaper27 13:33, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. -RiverHockey 14:09, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment If this article gets deleted, shouldn't Dipset the Movement get deleted as well?--Shadyaftrmathgunit 15:12, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Yes it should. I've added it to this nomination. I'm pretty sure this isn't going to change the minds of any of the participants above. It just duplicates the record label article.

Spellcast 15:30, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Added Dipset the Movement to the nomiation.--Shadyaftrmathgunit 16:15, 30 October 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.