Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/G.A.L-P.L.G


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. JohnCD (talk) 20:10, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

G.A.L-P.L.G

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Possible WP:HOAX, no evidence found for the existence of this concept or product. —Joshua Scott (LiberalFascist) talk 15:25, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge: I feel that this product does exist, but does not have enough to warrant it's own article. The article Laser harp seems to describe this technology, but because there are no reference it should just be merged. Funnyfarmofdoom (talk) 15:31, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete For a "super intelligent algorithm", you'd think it would have been noticed in a super reliable source. There is existing technology that accomplishes what this describes -- i.e., you move your fingers about and a machine interprets that, such a projected image of a keyboard that one can "type" upon.  GAL-PLG is kind of a long abbreviation, don't you think?  And it's kind of like Mr. Mxyzptlk, hard to pronounce.  Mandsford (talk) 15:43, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. No point in redirecting because it is not even verifiable that this is a real term. IronGargoyle (talk) 22:43, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Can't be verified, it is a likely hoax. Bearian (talk) 00:15, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:HOAX. I can't find any sources to verify this acronym or anything listed in the article. Erpert (let's talk about it) 07:15, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.