Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/G.A. Siwabessy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Ron Ritzman (talk) 03:24, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

G.A. Siwabessy

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

Possible copyright violation. Page was tagged for CSD as a copyvio with the note "The article had been published in magazines Tabaos, Media Information & Communications, for limited community, Maluku Foundation Scholarship Fund (YDBM), Volume 7, No. 3, October 2010, Jakarta". Speedy was declined as there was no URL provided. - Burpelson AFB ✈ 17:05, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as Copy right violation This reversion at the bottom saysThe article was written by Mutiara Siwabessy (grand daughter of GA. Siwabessy and published in magazines Tabaos, Media Information & Communications, for limited community, Maluku Foundation Scholarship Fund (YDBM), Volume 7, No. 3, October 2010, Jakarta. Which makes it seem an Open and shut copy violation. The Template for speedy would not let me include the Diff. After all the Pictures were deleted as Copyright violations this seems even more likely to be the case The Resident Anthropologist (talk) 17:30, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Weak keep and WP:REVDELETE As long as previous versions are WP:REVDELETED I see no reason to delete it. Though some more WP:RS would probably be beneficial.The Resident Anthropologist (talk) 00:37, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:41, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep and WP:REVDELETE. The subject meets WP:POLITICIAN. I've stubified the article to remove the copyright concerns. Location (talk) 18:27, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep current version. Closing admin may want to revision delete the copyvio. Ray  Talk 23:50, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
 * I would agree that as long as the old version is REVDELETEd the current version can be kept and expanded and this AfD withdrawn. Any admin can feel free to close this AfD. - Burpelson AFB ✈ 14:11, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.