Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/G.E.O.R.G.E


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was d.e.l.e.t.e., closing a little early due to clear consensus. --Core des at 06:33, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

G.E.O.R.G.E


Seems to be a, "Made-up web forum neologism" according to Omicronpersei8 and I agree. Tjbk tjb 00:47, 6 November 2006 (UTC) Oh... I still don't know what 'G.E.O.R.G.E.' stands for. - HAARP 01:11, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Per fails WP:WEB and the rest. Hello32020 00:53, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nominator - JNighthawk 00:57, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Only a few sentences long, nothing notable, and is pointless. What a waste!
 * Delete dumb. Danny Lilithborne 01:39, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Xdenizen 02:49, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
 * D.E.L.E.T.E. riana_dzasta 03:07, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. -Royalguard11 (Talk·Desk·Review Me!) 04:30, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia is not for things made up on a webforum one day. Resolute 05:35, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:NFT.-- danntm T C 15:19, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete I can think of several more notable ways to refer to a C.D. case. Like "C.D.C.A.S.E." and "W.I.L.L.I.A.M.F.B.U.C.K.L.E.Y." and "U.T.T.E.R.N.O.N.S.E.N.S.E." OfficeGirl 19:50, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete G.E.O.R.G.E. is a total fake... 
 * Delete per the above commenters. Yamaguchi先生 06:41, 9 November 2006
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.