Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/G. Kogelen Govindasamy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. WP:G7, both major contributors agreed at User_talk:Jonathan_A_Jones czar  12:44, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

G. Kogelen Govindasamy

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Subject is not genuinely notable, and original page was created as a vanity page by a close colleague of the subject, User:Aero777. The page was trimmed back to only contain information with some support in relaible sources, but this has not establisehd notability. The subject has now requested deletion through his close colleague: see the discussion at User talk:Jonathan A Jones. Jonathan A Jones (talk) 18:41, 22 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete : I acknowledge and accept the above verdict from User:Jonathan A Jones. Until subject can satisfy WP:Notability and more reliable references can be procured in the long-term, the article G. Kogelen Govindasamy should be deleted, as the best course of action at this point in time. Best regards, Aero777 (talk) 21:59, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Just to re-affirm, Dr. Kogelen hopes that the page G. Kogelen Govindasamy could be deleted as soon as possible, as it is causing significant misunderstanding among his colleagues. I don't believe it is necessary to discuss or contest this deletion over the course of 1 week as per the usual policy, as both main editors involved have agreed to nominate it for deletion. Aero777 (talk) 00:06, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
 * On another note, I wish to disclose that I am affiliated with the subject, as per Conflict of interest guidelines. Aero777 (talk) 04:03, 23 February 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.