Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/G. Michael Hopf


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) st170e talk 12:38, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

G. Michael Hopf

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:AUTHOR. ubiquity (talk) 23:41, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 23:53, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 23:53, 17 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Weak keep - His notability seems to be established from The New World but the page definitely needs additional sources for verification. Meatsgains (talk) 02:16, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep as I'm convinced by DGG, this can be improved. Delete as I found nothing convincingly better, nothing to suggest the necessary notability. Notifying for subject analysis.  SwisterTwister   talk  20:37, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. Relatively minor novelist, but since it'sSF there are pretty sure to be reviews. Published by Plume, the prestige imprint of Penguine B ooks. They wouldn't be publishing a whie series unless thedy were wqyuite popular.  DGG ( talk ) 05:20, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
 * keep His novels have a following, as DGG says publishers don't keep this up unless there are sales, and he does get hits on a news google search . E.M.Gregory (talk) 11:59, 20 May 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.