Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/G. W. Choudhury


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) — Sam Sailor 01:56, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

G. W. Choudhury

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article should be deleted as it is an orphan source, violates notability guideline and has POV issues. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.148.3.14 (talk) 08:25, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment - I completed this AfD for IP User:119.148.3.14, moving it from the talk page. ansh 666 00:06, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2016 September 4.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 00:15, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America1000 01:50, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. North America1000 01:50, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. North America1000 01:50, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. North America1000 01:50, 4 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails WP:NBIO. The single columbia.edu reference is unreliable, and does not establish notability. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 04:20, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Are you really saying that Columbia University is unreliable? 86.17.222.157 (talk) 11:02, 4 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep As Pakistan's Minister of Communications, satisfies WP:POLITICIAN. As the author of at least 14 books, including 4 held by over 400 libraries each and each cited more than 80 times, meets WP:PROF criterion #1. Covered in multiple books and at least one other encyclopedia, so easily meets WP:NBIO. The article is no longer an orphan (not that being one is a valid reason for deletion) and any NPOV problem can be dealt with through editing. --Worldbruce (talk) 08:49, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep, obviously, per WP:POLITICIAN, and probably other notability guidelines that I haven't checked because that one is enough. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 10:59, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep obviously as a minister. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:15, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 14:15, 7 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.