Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/G. Wray Gill (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Taking into account the comments from the first AfD and this one, it appears there are many mentions, but a lack of significant coverage to establish notability. RL0919 (talk) 02:33, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

G. Wray Gill
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log )

Re-nominating in the hope of getting a consensus - limited responses to first. This has been in CAT:NN's backlog for 12 years, so I really hope we can get an answer. There is some coverage, but I couldn't establish he meets WP:BIO or WP:GNG. Boleyn (talk) 21:58, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Louisiana-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 23:16, 24 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete Local lawyer fails WP:ANYBIO. Seems like he had a pretty interesting life and career, but that does not confer notability. KidAd  •  SPEAK  23:24, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete notable in local terms but not in Wikipedia terms. Similar articles could be constructed for hundreds of thousands of other lawyers. Mccapra (talk) 03:45, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 05:44, 25 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Basically a run-of-the-mill locally successful lawyer. BD2412  T 01:13, 1 September 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.