Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/G/O Digital


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Tegna Inc.. Liz Read! Talk! 04:56, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

G/O Digital

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Non-notable. Fails WP:NCORP. A small common business type. No historical value   scope_creep Talk  05:43, 31 March 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 06:42, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business, Companies, Arizona,  and Tennessee.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 05:56, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Merge to the article on parent Tegna Inc.. There is not much in this article, but it says the most operations were discontinued in 2018 and what was left became "TEGNA Marketing Solutions". The Tegna article does not reflect this, just saying it "owns" G/O, so it should be updated. MB 14:25, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete or redirect: A poorly-sourced article on a formerly-distinctly-named unit of Tegna Inc., with no indication that it ever attained distinct notability. As suggested above, some form of update might be applied to the information in the History and Properties/Digital sites sections there, but would require some coverage for the changes, which seems wanting. AllyD (talk) 15:55, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Tegna Inc.. MarioGom (talk) 17:09, 9 April 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.