Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/G3 (magazine)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Withdrawn. Joe Chill (talk) 19:42, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

G3 (magazine)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

I can't find significant coverage for this magazine. Joe Chill (talk) 21:38, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget  22:40, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * I'll venture a Keep on this one. How hard did you look for significant coverage?  I just spent about 3 minutes and found that g3 won the 2009 Publication of the Year award from Stonewall Awards, which I just added to the article along with references. I don't think it would be hard to find other supporting evidence to substantiate the claims to notability already in the article.  I say keep this and give it some time.  — LinguistAtLarge • Talk  19:31, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Several minutes. There's no need to insult me for finding a source that I didn't. Joe Chill (talk) 19:35, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Ok that's fair. I sincerely apologize that my comment was insulting to you. It was not intended to be. — LinguistAtLarge • Talk  19:41, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.