Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/G4 2006


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete, partially per the keep argument admitting lack of encyclopedic value. --Core desat  02:04, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

G4 2006

 * - (View AfD) (View log)

Subject of article does not meet notability requirements of WP:ORG Nv8200p talk 03:27, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Alas, this is a well written article and i'd love to keep it, however the topic is very non notable. THE KING 03:46, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:NOT. Certainly is not suitable for Wikipedia. Three of the given "references" at time of writing are blogs and are in fact the same, as are another three, implying very little or no real references to backup any sort of notability. The article's quality might be acceptable, but its content is not. Bungle44 20:14, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Well written, but not encyclopedic material. Rettetast 20:16, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep This article may be not be encyclopedic material, but it might be a starting point for something big in the future and what not a place to keep it as a archive than in Wikipedia? The referencing method may be wrong as maybe the author do know know how to do citation. Maybe, wiki could ask help from the public to aids its citation method. User:HweiMing/Hweiming 23:00, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment Your opinion is bound to be bias as you are the article creator. You admit the article is not of encyclopedia material, when Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and hence you are admitting that it also isn't suited for this purpose. Bungle44 15:25, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.