Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GAJ (2) (second nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the nomination was delete. Mailer Diablo 04:54, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

GAJ
Reason this is GAJ (2) is because there was a page at GAJ that was deleted previously.

Last AfD was only stopped beause nom was polite and removed notice. I think he should have stuck to the courage of his convictions. This page is about a self-published book, which means it is probably not notable per WP:BK. I accept, though, that is could be notable if it provoked important social phenomena and reviews etc. But let us consider the three reviews we have as links: one is a university paper, another is a local Ottawa paper and the other is a yoga magazine. Hardly important national or interantional coverage. Overall, non-noatbel, free advertising for someone's self-published book that has had no real impact. Batmanand | Talk 20:41, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete for all the reasons given by Batmanand, specifically WP:BK. HumbleGod 23:07, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, WP is not a card catalog of self-published books. NawlinWiki 02:22, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Per nom--Nick Y. 00:44, 6 July 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.