Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GAKwich


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete (no contest). Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 07:27, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

GAKwich
Was PRODed by me with, 'Non-notable sandwich. 2 Google hits.' PROD was removed by anonymous user. --Signed and Sealed, JJJJust (T C) 00:35, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete, tagged as nonsense.-- Andeh 00:40, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, but I don't see how this meets the criteria for patent nonsense. Aplomado  talk 00:43, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Dr. Knutson created this sandwich when he was a hungry college student with only the above ingredients in his refrigerator.-- Andeh 00:46, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
 * How is that nonsense? The criteria reads thusly: "Patent nonsense and gibberish, an unsalvageably incoherent page with no meaningful content. This does not include: poor writing, partisan screeds, obscene remarks, vandalism, fictional material, material not in English, badly translated material, implausible theories, or hoaxes." While the sandwich is clearly non-notable, the article is still coherent. Aplomado  talk 00:48, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Fictional/hoaxish.-- Andeh 01:39, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Unfortunatly that is not a critera for speedy deletion. --Edgelord 02:14, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

Do not Delete this sandwich is tasty!!! This sounds like a good article.
 * Delete per nom. Aplomado is right - while it's silly, it isn't patent nonsense by the WP definition. Yomangani talk 01:07, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete —  1) This sounds like advertising. 2) Is this sandwich well known? Probably not. 3) No references whatsoever - not even a company website. –-  kungming·  2  |  (Talk ·Contact) 01:15, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable, absolutely non-sense, and sounds like advertisement. Daniel's page    ☎  01:48, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete; we need to add sandwiches to CSD A7. &mdash;Bunchofgrapes (talk) 02:33, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete: Not worthy of comment. --Dennette 03:14, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, good thing I didn't invent a sandwich with just the ingredients in my college refrigerator. NawlinWiki 03:54, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, as if there was really any other option. It's a sandwich, and not a notable one at that. RandyWang ( chat me up/fix me up ) 10:38, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.--schgooda 15:46, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. It's not a notable sandwich. Google it and you get just 2 hits. -- Nish kid 64 18:22, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per neologism. -- zzuuzz (talk) 20:37, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Faster the better. - Corporal Tunnel 21:22, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete muy rapido. will381796 21:35, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete While I may agree on the potential tastiness of said sandwich, there is no WP:TASTY guideline we can apply here. - CosmicPenguin (Talk) 02:46, 21 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:NFT or WP:NEO It's not like a club sandwich or a caesar's salad, or even a BLT. Ohconfucius 01:55, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

This is not something I made up in school. It's not my creation. It's a sandwich that is becoming quite popular, especially in Indiana. It's no different than a pb&J or a BLT or whatever. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.12.116.136 (talk • contribs) 03:52, 21 August 2006


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.