Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GAT International


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete - probably should have been speedied. (ESkog)(Talk) 13:43, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

GAT International

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This is a contested deletion. The article has no sources other than the company's own website, and I believe it is unsourceable, and reads like an advert. If this were a recently created article, it probably would have been shot on sight. I was [ told to come to you guys], and the following conversation ensued:
 * If I go to afd, how will you vote? Maybe we could just skip that step .. I don't want to get into some deletion process if there is a good reason to keep these after all.[]
 * Well there are rules that state no original research. but there is also a rule that states if a source can be referenced, it should not be deleted. so I will vote no for delete. Remember we are trying to create an encyclopedia i.e. the sum of all human knowledge. []
 * Do you mean that you think we can reference a source? Which one(s)?[]

No response. Oh well. Better safe than sorry. You know what to do. --Abu-Fool Danyal ibn Amir al-Makhiri 15:45, 11 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Speedy Delete per WP:SPAM--Greatestrowerever 15:47, 11 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete WP:SPAM -  irides centi   (talk to me!)  17:43, 11 April 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.