Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GBA Special Features


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 03:03, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

GBA Special Features

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG. The article currently has no sources, and a Google search turns up sources that are either unrelated or unreliable. Most info on the page appears to be original research. PROD removed by article creator. JudgeRM  (talk to me)  14:18, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions.  JudgeRM   (talk to me)  14:24, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.  JudgeRM   (talk to me)  14:24, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete - Any of these factoids would belong in the various related game boy articles. As is, this is just an WP:OR-based collection of WP:Trivia. Not even worth a redirect because I'm pretty sure the article title is made up by the article creator. Sergecross73   msg me  10:49, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:06, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. Wikipedia isn't a strategy guide. This won't ever be an encyclopedic article and the one piece of trivia could be included in the article about the relevant game if a source could be dug up from somewhere.  A  Train ''talk 10:30, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. Even if it exists, that's not a reason to keep an article on the subject. Could easily be integrated into the one example. soetermans . ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 08:00, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete, wikipedia is not a game guide. Coolabahapple (talk) 10:37, 14 August 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.