Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GBU-32


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was no consensus; keep. Johnleemk | Talk 15:08, 17 January 2006 (UTC)

GBU-32
Very little here. The edit history suggests that an editor started this and never got any further before being indefinitely blocked. The "reminder - re-check data" comment in the edit history suggests that what is here might not be reliable, hence delete CLW 22:39, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: GBU-31 and GBU-36 are in a similar state. GBU-37 is good enough for a stub.  There are many articles about these bombs et al, many of them quite good: .  &mdash;Quarl (talk) 2006-01-11 23:44Z 
 * Expand then Keep. These seem like they would be easily verifiable (for example ).  Since the other GBU articles are good I think there would be enough contributors to work on it.  I'd say get the attention of those people and then give it some time before deleting it.  If consensus does not agree with that I would say Redirect to Joint Direct Attack Munition.   &mdash;Quarl (talk) 2006-01-11 23:47Z 


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.