Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GC Tooth Mousse


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 06:13, 26 November 2008 (UTC)

GC Tooth Mousse

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

No assertion of notability per WP:CORP, google search turns up wikipedia first, followed by sales sites. WLU (t) (c) (rules - simple rules) 14:28, 16 November 2008 (UTC) 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:28, 21 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete as a failure of WP:PRODUCT. No reliable, independent sources I can find apart from "buy it here!" places, and no indication this particular mould-killing mousse is notable compared to any other mould-killing mousse. Ironholds (talk) 01:29, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep per this study ("Purpose: The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficiency of GC Tooth Mousse in the treatment of patients with dentin hypersensitivity caused by various factors") and this article in  Dental Products Report Europe. Also, for about 30 more Google Scholar hits and the other news article in The Times that I cited in the article. Icewedge (talk) 03:07, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, spam, promoter manged to get a brief mention in an article with many other products, no other substantial coverage. Fee Fi Foe Fum (talk) 04:50, 21 November 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.