Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GCcollab


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to GCTools. Seraphimblade Talk to me 04:27, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

GCcollab

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Theroadislong thinks this is spam. Certainly, I think it is non-notable. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 14:37, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete I think it's both. Spam and not notable. Praxidicae (talk) 14:38, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
 * See commentary in Articles for deletion/GCconnex. Uncle G (talk) 15:34, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Merge with GCpedia and GCconnex into a larger omnibus article on GCtools. I agree that we don't really need separate articles about each individual component of it, but between the sources that have been proffered in the other deletion discussions, we've got enough references to render a keepable article about the overall thing. Bearcat (talk) 21:20, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 21:23, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. KCVelaga (talk) 06:01, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. KCVelaga (talk) 06:01, 9 May 2019 (UTC)

I made the updates to all the 3 of the pages, and I agree with the previous proposition to merge with GCpedia and GCconnex into a larger omnibus article on GCTools. I'm fairly new to wikipedia editing and I tried creating a GCTools page and it got flagged for speedy deletion, for understandable reasons. I've caught up on the guidelines and would be able to contribute more effectively on the merged "GCTools page"

Jason.Henri (talk) 13:45, 9 May 2019 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Merge with GCpedia and GCconnex. Significant overlap. The combination of the three articles meets WP:GNG. —  Newslinger  talk   22:01, 11 May 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   17:32, 15 May 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.