Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GEC Consulting


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 17:12, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

GEC Consulting

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Does not appear to be notable, but I'm being a bit cautious on this one and doing an AfD rather than A7 (although if a passing admin thinks this is A7, go ahead with a speedy delete). Most of the references are just business listings and directories. There is one Forbes interview which is why I went to AfD. But there are not multiple reliable sources supporting notability. Singularity42 (talk) 14:34, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Singularity42 (talk) 14:34, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Georgia (country)-related deletion discussions. Singularity42 (talk) 14:34, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete: The only two sources that should be of focus is Consultancy.eu and Forbes. The first source, Consultancy, contains useful information, but seems to be possibly unreliable. The second source is reliable and written by an international journalist from Forbes Georgia. Given it's only an interview with minimal editorial dictation, more reliable sources are needed to establish notability. Multi7001 (talk) 04:22, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete: as per nom. and . - Hatchens (talk) 11:06, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per . Best, GPL93 (talk) 14:23, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:SERIESA. 10:54, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep I believe the page should not be deleted as I found information about the company outreach and its contribution to economy and society. Here are some what I found: Company information on UN Global Compact website, information about company on governmental website, information about company offers for SME on leading Georgian Bank website, company is member of German business association and is listed on their web, this event was powered by the GEC Consulting, information about company on public broadcast, information about company service on public broadcast. - Svani 170891 (talk) 10:38, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi and welcome to the AfD!  No one is saying the business does not exist or is carrying on business (possibly important business).  The question is whether the business meets Wikipedia's requirements for notability, as set out here: Notability (organizations and companies), and more specifically, WP:ORGCRIT.  A reliable, secondary source is defined here: Reliable sources.  Bank listings, Facebook accounts, government listings, etc. are all evidence that it exists, but they are not secondary sources that support notability. Singularity42 (talk) 20:47, 18 January 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.