Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GEET Engine


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 16:55, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

GEET Engine

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No reliable sources, promotional, WP:FRINGE. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof. PROD contested by article author. shoy (reactions) 14:11, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. shoy (reactions) 14:12, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. shoy (reactions) 14:12, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

hai! the reviewer say that my article is unrealiable. i don't understand why it is unrealiable. the GEET Engine inventor share his knowledge on website. and then i sorted out his content and uploaded it to wikipedia. is this an unreliable source? because i don't konw what is problerms for my article, so it is hard to improved. but i want do a good article. so i hope someone can tell me what is ths problerms for my article. i can rewrite it. thanyou!
 * Hi, please read our page about identifying reliable sources. Not everything on the internet is true, or a reliable source. Self-published websites are almost never reliable sources. shoy (reactions) 17:59, 25 October 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete per the nomination. XOR&#39;easter (talk) 17:17, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete Not suitable for Wikipedia. scope_creep (talk) 11:22, 28 October 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.