Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GEM100

GEM100 was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete

GEM100
A engine that started less than half a month ago? Not notable. --fvw *  20:16, 2004 Dec 18 (UTC)


 * Keep. GEM100 may have started recently, but is quickly growing. --User:195.229.241.169
 * That's wonderful, then I'm sure it will be sufficiently notable for an article in no time, at which time one can be created. --fvw *  20:43, 2004 Dec 18 (UTC)
 * Delete. When it becomes notable, we can write an article on it then. -- Antaeus Feldspar 22:27, 18 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. --Wikimol 22:41, 18 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete until the IPO. Wyss 23:26, 18 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * delete. not notable. -R. S. Shaw 01:06, 2004 Dec 19 (UTC)
 * del Mikkalai 02:31, 19 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete it. &mdash;[[en:RaD Man|RaD Man (talk)]] 03:57, 19 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete - Andre Engels 22:13, 19 Dec 2004 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.