Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GE Ecomagination


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Closed per consensus to delete. Note: article treats the subject more neutrally and has better references. — Athaenara ✉  06:55, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

GE Ecomagination

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This reads like an advertisement for the campaign, and I think it might be copied directly off the ecomagination site. At the very least, this should be marked as not npov Codyrank (talk) 04:10, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, just an unremarkable marketing campaign. Merge to General Electric if absolutely necessary.  Lankiveil (speak to me) 05:41, 8 March 2008 (UTC).
 * Delete per nom. I agree if must need then add in to General Electric. - Jahnx ( talk ) 09:32, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, perhaps deserving of a mention in the main General Electric page but is not notable enough for its own article - Dumelow (talk) 12:10, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge with General Electric. Not notable enough to warrant a separate page.-- TBC  ♣§♠  !?!   19:56, 8 March 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.