Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GGF-001 Phoenix Gundam


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to List of SD Gundam G-Generation F mobile suits.  MBisanz  talk 17:11, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

GGF-001 Phoenix Gundam

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This fictional weapon does not establish notability independent of its series. Without non-trivial coverage in reliable third party sources, it is just made up of unnecessary plot summary and original research. TTN (talk) 14:45, 18 October 2008 (UTC) 
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions.   -- TTN (talk) 14:52, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable outside the series, no 3rd party refs. P HARMBOY  ( TALK ) 19:42, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge to List of SD Gundam G-Generation F mobile suits. Does not meet notability criteria to have its own article, but can be covered in a list of mobile suits from the series. --Farix (Talk) 13:38, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge as per Farix. Edward321 (talk) 23:01, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hers fold  (t/a/c) 02:24, 23 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Merge into one of the 3 lists from Category:Gundam_Mobile_Suits. I'm not familiar with this topic enough to say into which list precisely. VG &#x260E; 14:10, 23 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletions. Raven1977 (talk) 16:27, 26 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.