Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GG (cannabis)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  06:31, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

GG (cannabis)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Just deleted at Articles for deletion/Gorilla Glue (cannabis), but seems to object vehemently to a G4 deletion, so let's do this again. I still see no non-trivial coverage apart from a lawsuit. power~enwiki ( π, ν ) 01:14, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. The previous AFD was pretty clear on delete, and nothing has significantly changed in terms of sourcing for notability. We have the lawsuit only sourced to The Cannabist, so that lawsuit is neither WP:DUE or meets WP:GNG. The Reuters article only has passing mention. Civilized isn't a reliable source or anything contributing to notability, and the Colorado Springs Independent is just a local newspaper. New sources, but no improvements, so technically G4 would still apply here.


 * Bacardi also created GG 1 (cannabis) and Gorilla Glue (cannabis), so I would suggest including those redirects as part of the deletion too. This is starting to feel like tossing anything against the wall to see what sticks directly after a delete AfD. As at other cannabis AfD's as part of cleaning up "variety" articles, this topic has less muster than others that have been deleted. Kingofaces43 (talk) 02:06, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 03:09, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 03:09, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organisms-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 03:09, 24 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete. This really should have been G4'd. We already had this discussion. Natureium (talk) 03:11, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per reasoning on the last AFD. Nothing seems to have changed from then, and I agree this should have qualified for G4 since there were no new sources. Tillerh11 (talk) 15:12, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete as above. Bondegezou (talk) 10:28, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
 * delete this is a brand of cannabis and there is nothing much notable about the brand. Jytdog (talk) 23:21, 30 June 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.