Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GG Bond


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. – sgeureka t•c 06:02, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

GG Bond

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

The page is filled with false and unneeded information, and the topic is not notable or widely known. BenderRobot (talk) 17:59, 8 August 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:50, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:51, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:51, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Nominated for the 2009 "Best Domestic Animation" at Shanghai TV Festival.  Winner of the 2009 KAKU Annual "Best Animated Series" as reported by Beijing Review.  GG Bond character listed as one of China’s "Top 10 Animation Characters" of 2010 by China Toy Trade.  We need Chinese-reading Wikipedians to translate sources found through a nominal search. Style and sourcing can then be addressed through regular editing. Being unknown in the West means nothing if can be determined as notable to a nation of billions.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 02:20, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 00:37, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Keep per Mr. Schmidt. Clean up as necessary if there are inaccuracies. Freakshownerd (talk) 03:21, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.