Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GH avisualagency

keepJ@dropframe.net 20:26, 15 December 2005 (UTC)

keep Mrethan 17:41, 16 December 2005 (UTC) I notice that this page, which was full of letters in support of GH, keeps being deleted by keithlaw and perhaps others. This is supposed to be a forum of open debate. Erasing others' statements is intellectually dishonest. One can only wonder if the vandals are employees of competing agencies. In any case, this is what I originally wrote: This company clearly meets wiki's requirements for inclusion, in spite of the fact that those requirements are slanted in favor of public corporations. GH--which is almost as much a collective of artists as it is a company, and deserves inclusion on that basis alone--is admittedly in no danger of being used to index stock prices any time soon. But these five individuals have made an impact far disproportionate to their numerical strength through their seminal work with many listed companies, such as volkswagon and MTV (aka Viacom). And unlike many design agencies, these guys have had fine art shows as well. Wikipedia is enhanced by their inclusion. As for the detractors? I'm not seeing much thought put into their calls for deletion, beyond sycophantic adhesion to the arbitrary "1K" plus google hits metric, which GH meets in any case.

DELETE: What about this organization makes it of interest to the public? The page appears to be some attempt at advertising or promotion, a free hosting of an unimpressive resume. If it meets the criteria for deletion, it should be deleted.

keep