Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GIANTmicrobes


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. -- Cirt (talk) 19:54, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

GIANTmicrobes

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Doesn't seem to meet general notability guidelines. --Technopat (talk) 12:54, 25 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep: There are a good number of articles about GIANTmicrobes in reliable third-party sources. They need to be added to the article (which I can take care of later when I'm not editing from a mobile device). LaMenta3 (talk) 06:17, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep: There are plenty of reliable sources mentioned on the about page: http://www.giantmicrobes.com/us/content/about.html and I'm sure they'll get added to the article. —Disavian (talk/contribs) 06:31, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

es:Wikipedia:Consultas de borrado/GIANTmicrobes
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 12:59, 1 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep per Disavian and add the sources there. Roscelese (talk &sdot; contribs) 16:42, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep on account of their incredible cuteness ;-) Voyager640 (talk) 00:04, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
 * weak Keep somewhat like an ad. Requires cleanup. SYSS Mouse (talk) 16:12, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep, weakly. Business making plush toys shaped like germs.  This seems to have attracted enough notice to get to notability. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 14:48, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.