Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GJ 3959


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Unopposed.  Sandstein  08:47, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

GJ 3959

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The article makes no claims for notability per WP:NASTRO and I can't find any myself. It is one of millions of red dwarfs, very faint, relatively close to the sun but not notably so. It is listed in tables or catalogues in a number of research papers, but none are specific to this star. Lithopsian (talk) 13:37, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. My searches didn't turn up additional sources on this. Fails WP:NASTRO. In particular I note this line from NASTRO: Being mentioned alongside other similar objects, such as in a table of properties of 200 newly discovered supernovae, does not constitute non-trivial coverage. The two sources in the article are titled Trigonometric Parallaxes for 1507 Nearby Mid-to-late M Dwarfs and Wide field search for nearby faint stars, both of which address bulk groups of stars rather than focusing on individually noteworthy objects. Alsee (talk) 19:32, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:06, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:56, 3 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.