Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GJ Reynolds


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 23:53, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

GJ Reynolds

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Poorly sourced BLP of dubious notability Gamaliel  ( talk ) 05:14, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Utterly non-notable "multi level marketer", a profession whose practitioners benefit from a poorly-referenced Wikipedia biography. Cullen328  Let's discuss it  06:09, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:37, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:37, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:37, 20 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete as non notable bloke. – Davey 2010 •  (talk)  02:53, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. I poked around for sources a couple of times since I first found this article. There are a large number of press releases and routine event listings which made searching more difficult. One press release announced that he had recently discussed his Wikipedia page on his radio show (wow), but I did not find anything usable. As for his radio show, its website lists a large number of affiliates, mostly small Christian stations and college stations, but it's a one-way reference. I didn't find any examples of affiliate station websites that mention his show. It looks to me like just an early morning filler program for small stations (at best). Regardless, no indication of notability. Grayfell (talk) 22:08, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Nothing involved passes notability guidelines.John Pack Lambert (talk) 22:42, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.