Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GMA Pinoy TV


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep. Ifnord 02:39, 28 January 2006 (UTC)

GMA Pinoy TV
Delete, article reads like an advertisement for Cable Service. &mdash;  Kaiser B  02:45, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Blatant Advertising Avi 02:57, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep This is a the competitor to The Filipino Channel. If it goes, then TFC has to go.    Ruby 03:35, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
 * You are correct; they both read like ad-copy to me ("Undisputed all-Filipino"?!) Avi 05:24, 23 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Strong Keep. It is most definitely notable.--ThreeAnswers 03:43, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, notable. If you think its advertising it should be tagged with -- Astrokey44 |talk 04:47, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
 * You think that the article as it stands is salvagable? Avi 05:24, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
 * It does require significant clean-up as it reads like an advertisement. But I don't see how its notability could be disputed.--ThreeAnswers 06:55, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Yes, adverts can be trimmed by deleting all the words like "forges", " Highly calibrated" and "To establish global exposure" - theres normally a few facts in there somewhere -- Astrokey44 |talk 08:33, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
 * I've cleaned-up the article and added some links.--ThreeAnswers 21:27, 23 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Weak keep but needs extensive cleanup. Current version is very ad-like and doesn't assert notability in a convincing way. Robin Johnson 11:15, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Rewrite gotta be cleaned up or deleted, must remove all but one image. &mdash;This user has left wikipedia  12:23 2006-01-23
 * Keep and rewrite. Mushintalk 14:16, 23 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.