Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GMail Drive (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:16, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

GMail Drive
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Not notable, no WP:THIRDPARTY refs. mono 16:53, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:52, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep, ZDNet, reviewed by CNet, TechCrunch coverage, LifeHacker, engadget I can see plenty of notability through these news sources.  N ERDY S CIENCE D UDE  (✉ message • changes) 13:19, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep. No arguments for deletion have been made that are different from the nomination in November, so I don't see how this nomination will not be WP:SNOWed. --Karnesky (talk) 15:29, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep or Merge - We should keep this article it is important and notable enough to keep. Or, merge this article with Gmail or 'its parent company'.. Whenaxis (talk) 11:13, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. Just reading what this is about makes you wonder why this should not be notable. A Google search proves its notability, delivering plenty of suitable refs. Merge to Gmail would not be appropriate, article is decisively different. Add some refs, though. Nageh (talk) 10:45, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.