Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GNSS FATIMA


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Author says "I have worked on this text but I can see that you do not like it.". &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 10:53, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

GNSS FATIMA

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A proposed mars navigation system sourced entirely from obscure primary papers. No independent sources. Written by a WP:SPA. Guy (Help!) 22:36, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per WP:G7 as the article has been blanked by its creator. -KAP03(Talk &bull;&#32;Contributions &bull;&#32;Email) 22:59, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Undeleted due to challnge by User:JFG who stated at WP:REFUND " I remember reading it as informative. There are also several internal links pointing to it. The article possibly warrants expansion to discuss the general concept of a Martian satellite navigation system, including other sources and other concepts". This is not a vote for me either way, but please consider JFG's point of view. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:57, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment being written by a SPA is not a reason to delete. They may have a COI. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:03, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
 * No, the reasons for delete are that it lacks credible independent sources to substantiate notability and is written entirely from primary sources, plus the fact that it appears to be promotional, which is unsurprising given that it was written by a SPA who is very likely to be one of the cited authors. It's a relevant fact. Guy (Help!) 19:24, 26 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Comment Article's creator blanked the page again so the page should be speedy deleted per WP:G7 -KAP03(Talk &bull;&#32;Contributions &bull;&#32;Email) 21:19, 26 March 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.