Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GOATM


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 18:51, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

GOATM

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Article on a software program that fails notability criteria. Prod was removed by the article creator with the statement that "there can' trealy [sic] be credible sources because the game was just created and can not be found any where  [sic] else on the internet." &mdash; KuyaBriBri Talk 19:38, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete No indication of notability. Looks like a case of WP:MADEUP. AndrewWTaylor (talk) 21:05, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete: non-notable. Made-up. SL93 (talk) 21:45, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:31, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:32, 24 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete WP:MADEUP. Would this have been a candidate for A7? Isn't "web content" or a person, so no. OSbornarfcontribs. 00:52, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete: I don' trealy see any proof of notability. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 01:39, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - After searching, not finding coverage, let alone coverage in reliable sources. Northamerica1000(talk) 11:04, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - unreferenced, no indication of notability, created by an SPA as potentially promotional.Dialectric (talk) 04:26, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - and acquaint the creator of the article with Notability criteria. See "that there can' trealy [sic] be credible sources because the game was just created and can not be found any where" statement referring to this article.  NewbyG  ( talk) 21:15, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.