Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GOB3L.Y3R.201.2


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Neil N  talk to me 11:50, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

GOB3L.Y3R.201.2

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Clearly a non-notable article subject per WP:GNG. Doesn't fit within a CSD tag criterion, and the creator deleted my PROD tag. So... yeah. It's here now. Sorry in advance.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   02:34, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:GNG. Ilyushka88 | Talk! Contribs 02:46, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. This has no coherency to be found whatsoever. An in-joke in a show only recognized by a few.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 03:59, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. Utterly fails WP:GNG Ajf773 (talk) 10:38, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - Clearly does not pass WP:GNG. Hx7 12:46, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:34, 16 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete. Nowhere near notable enough to meet WP:GNG, no reliable coverage whatsoever. I would also be OK with a redirect to We Bare Bears.  Omni Flames ( talk ) 08:08, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. Most articles may be incoherent.''' Ciaerwin Tanpiengco III Leverkusen 11:24, 18 July 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Daskjhon john (talk • contribs)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.