Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GROUND


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 02:01, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

GROUND

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:NMEDIA Razer Talk 10:27, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist  (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 10:53, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist  (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 10:53, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist  (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 10:53, 26 June 2017 (UTC)


 * I've speedy deleted the duplicate at GROUND Magazine. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 13:47, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Actually, GROUND Magazine is the slightly older of the two and is the original, but the two are essentially identical, so if the result is Keep then it's probably better to undelete GROUND Magazine and delete GROUND. But I don't see any point in swapping them around at this stage and retargeting the AFD. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 16:07, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

Hello, they created both pages. then tagged the first one GROUND Magazine for speedy deletion, immediately they created the right one, this was a faster way to change article's name following Wikipedia's suggestion. The tag on the current page GROUND seem a bit fishy since one minute after also the author Ismael Ogando who is tagged in GROUND is also marked for deletion very recently, almost a minute after they tagged GROUND, it seems an action with bad intentions, likely happened with the wikicommon images which are placed with consent of the author and were deliberately deleted! also an article from 5 years ago was tagged as irrelevant for the encyclopedia. This is clearly an act of vandals, since the author tagged target is currently alive and at risk of political persecution. Lets not get dramatic and paranoid. But clearly there was a serious intent to damage and erase this author's work, therefore this is an action of #Vandalism.2A06:8781:0:305:254B:4F73:48DA:16C4 (talk) 12:29, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
 * SPEEDY DELETION as G11, pure promotion. - Tom &#124; Thomas.W talk 17:00, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete, per Thomas.W's --Discasto (talk) 08:03, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete as clearly not notable. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 14:42, 3 July 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.