Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GSC 03905-01870


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 21:40, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

GSC 03905-01870

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Comprehensively fails WP:NASTRO. So faint and insignificant it isn't even in Simbad, and the only published research is the discovery paper. The article appears to be just promotion of a new discovery that has no notability whatsoever. Lithopsian (talk) 19:08, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete I have read other astronomy articles and I think the article must be deleted. Awvazquez (talk) 20:28, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 21:10, 29 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete. The only meaningful source is Barquin's description, which pretty much meets the definition of WP:PRIMARY. Basically, he set out to look for an eclipsing binary in a delimited region of sky and found one. That's not notable. Tarl N. ( discuss ) 21:57, 29 May 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.