Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GTunnel


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 02:39, 16 December 2023 (UTC)

GTunnel

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Little evidence of notability or third-party source coverage outside of passing mentions. Searches for the product name itself largely direct to a different project of the same name on GitHub. -  C HAMPION  (talk) (contributions) (logs) 02:33, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -  C HAMPION  (talk) (contributions) (logs) 02:33, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  05:45, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom - I also found this how-to article, but it doesn't seem to be enough for GNG. StereoFolic (talk) 16:19, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: per nom - fails NPRODUCT. Merging to Garden Networks won't help, as the target fails NCORP. Owen&times;  &#9742;  22:03, 10 December 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.