Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GURPS Blood Types (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Redirect and merge relevant material to List of GURPS books. --Haemo 18:47, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

GURPS Blood Types
AfDs for this article: 
 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Book of gaming instructions that fails WP:BK or WP:FICTION as only claim to notability is that it is supplement for a 1995 role playing book. The article content does not provide context or discussion of the books merit, but seems to be a platform for of a WP:POV fork from Vampire.Links to publisher, related books fail to compensate for lack of notable content. Gavin Collins 11:12, 30 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Redirect to List of GURPS books Percy Snoodle 12:54, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Neutral, but have already merged one line of info in List of GURPS books. --Goochelaar 13:01, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirect so try a redirect already. FrozenPurpleCube 14:21, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirect it's really sad that such an obvious delete has to be voted on numerous times. I really suspect that some editors tend to vote based on their personal appreciation of a topic, rather than policy. Eleland 14:49, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment Actually, this is the first time we are discussing this item. The previous nomination included, all together, many books of vastly diverse notability. --Goochelaar 14:58, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Well, to me, the sad thing is, I doubt any of us would have objected to just putting a #REDIRECT on the page and not bothering with the discussion. If there's any real concern about what to redirect and not, it'd be best done by asking on List of GURPS books what people thought any exceptions should be.  Possibly with invites to folks who'd already participated in the discussion.  But instead, we get these AFD's that are pretty much all going the same way.   FrozenPurpleCube 15:03, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment Sorry, I just noticed the "2nd nom" and assumed. Mass noms have their own issues; they always seem to lead to wild accusations ("you're trying to censor all Moképon information because you don't like it!") and I think we need a better procedure for them. Eleland 15:14, 30 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Comment For those interested, I've set up a discussion on Talk:List of GURPS books where we can hopefully handle this subject directly without further AFD's. FrozenPurpleCube 15:17, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirect &mdash; A brief summary on the list page should suffice. &mdash; RJH (talk) 16:29, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete unless significant coverage from reliable, independent sources are found Corpx 00:25, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirect to List of GURPS books per FrozenPurpleCube et al. -- JHunterJ 12:15, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, Wikipedia is not a game guide. J I P  | Talk 10:08, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.