Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GVMC Dutch Bungalow


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Jayjg (talk) 03:39, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

GVMC Dutch Bungalow

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

No indication of notability in that it fails to show significant coverage in multiple independent sources. 98.248.33.198 (talk) 19:49, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

Note: submitting in good faith for IP. tedder (talk) 15:37, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, insufficient evidence of notability in reliable sources. To the extent this is mentioned elsewhere, it is in passing or on a local site as news of a building renovation.  Should be mentioned if at all on a page about the Visakha Museum or the Maritime Museum of Visakhapatnam, whichever one the building actually houses.   Glenfarclas   ( talk ) 17:55, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Visakha Museum - A 150-plus year old colonial era building does have historic value. Frontline (U.S. TV series) calls it "locally famous"  (in a city of over 1.3 million, "local" doesn't mean a tiny village).  The Hindu has written bout its preservation efforts and difficulties.  While there isn't much written about the bungalow itself, the museum does have more coverage, from both Frontline and other sources like The Tribune and The Hindu Business Line. --Oakshade (talk) 01:46, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Regrettably, "GVMC Dutch Bungalow" is a term made up for this article because "Dutch Bungalow" was considered "too general." Since it sounds like Dutch Bungalow actually is what they call it, I could support a redirect from that term, or from that term with an appropriate parenthetical, but not from the invented "GVMC" title.  Glenfarclas   ( talk ) 17:49, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 03:27, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.