Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GWAR Enemies & Victims


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Sr13 21:18, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

GWAR Enemies & Victims
AfDs for this article: 
 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Indiscriminate list of people that are considered enemies of GWAR. Doesn't assert how any of this information is notable, and lacks reliable sources. If kept, needs a rewrite to fit the Manual of Style, as currently it reads more like prose than an encyclopedic article. NeoChaosX (talk, walk) 19:00, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
 * ... uhm. Wow. Obviously, I've missed a lot not going to a GWAR show. However... this looks to be original research, if nothing else, as well as being thin on reliable sources to back up the commentary. I hate to use the word, but "fancruft" is a pretty good way to describe this. Delete - I'm sure some of it might find a home in the GWAR article, but the full rundown is very excessive. Tony Fox (arf!) review? 20:09, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
 * First: What's GWAR? From this article, I can't tell if it's a band, a science fiction show, or some sort of paramilitary organization.  Second: Delete.  Unless, that is, someone comes up with some actual reliable sources; I couldn't find any by googling.  By the way, I did find an answer to my first question while googling.  Apparently, the answer is, kind of all of the above. -FisherQueen (Talk) 21:41, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
 * I wish they were a paramilitary organizasation. then maybe we might be allowed to nuke them into orbit (have you by now guessed that I don't like GWAR?) Blood Red Sandman  (Talk)   (Contribs) 23:36, 5 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete Not just for my anti-GWAR bias, but more imprtantly for the sheer lack of notability. I hereby challenge you to find someone who cares. Blood Red Sandman  (Talk)   (Contribs) 23:09, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable, non-encyclopaedic, and just downright ridiculous. Terraxos 01:50, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
 * BJAODN Please! This is hilarious! Chubbles 21:42, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Virginia-related deletions.   -- John Vandenberg 03:11, 8 July 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.